25 November 2013

Hannukah

This might be rather long. Bear with me. Hannukah is not a straightforward holiday at all, reflecting deeply ambivalent traditional Jewish views toward Greece and its culture.
On the one hand, there is respect. Yavan, the eponymous biblical ancestor of Greece, is seen as the greatest inheritor of the blessing of Yaphet, Noach's son, wherein it is prophesied yapht Elokim l'Yaphet (God will enlarge-materially/enlarge-intellectually/beautify Yaphet). Rav Hirsch takes that further, seeing the Greeks as some sort of partner with the Jews, preparing the way for the second portion of the prophecy, that God/Yaphet/that-which-God-bestows-on-Yaphet will dwell in the tents of Shem. Sorry for the slashes, Hebrew is hard to translate. The wisdom of the Greeks is acknowledged, at least with regard to observable matters; on at least one occasion, the rabbis of the Talmud acknowledge that the Greek view seems superior to their own. Perhaps most astonishingly, Greek is said to be the only language other than Hebrew that can be used to write a kosher sefer Torah.
And yet, there is the other hand. Greece is one of the four empires of oppression, putting the imposition of Greek culture and law on a par with outright slaughter of the entire nation as threatened by Persia in the Purim story, or with the destruction of the Beit HaMikdosh as executed by Babylon and Rome (with distinctions between them that I won't go into now; maybe a future post can compare the rest of the empires). Of the four, Greece is characterized in the vision of Daniel by a four-headed, four-winged leopard signifying its particular ferocity and that it will cover the entire world. Fierce and world-spanning even in comparison to Rome, mind you. In the vision of Nebuchadnezzar, Greece is the copper belly, loins, and thighs of the statue. I haven't been able to find a satisfying explanation of that symbolism, so I won't really address it, but feel free to speak up if you see a way that it fits. Most relevant to Hannukah, in the second verse of bereishit, Greece is identified with choshech, darkness.
How can we reconcile these views? First, I think it is important to note that Hannukah was more a civil war amongst the Jews with Greek involvement than a simple revolution. The Greeks did not interfere with Jewish religious practices until the Hellenized Jews asked them to. So, the struggle and the victory was not really against the Seleucid empire, it was against something wrong with the Jewish people. Surely, though, if Greek culture and wisdom are good things in themselves, they are also good for the Jews, no? Here, I would like to bring in Rav Matis Weinberg, who wrote about the connection between the Hannukah story and the two weekly Torah portions that can be read therein. Rachel and her sons, especially Yoseph, are traditionally associated with the material world, wealth, and aesthetic beauty, just like the Yavan. According to a number of commentators, this is the real reason that the brothers sell Yoseph into slavery. Simple jealousy and hatred are seen as such severe sins that they would disqualify one from founding and leading a tribe in Israel, so there are many attempts to discern other motives. According to this view, the brothers are concerned that Yoseph's concern with such worldly matters would poison the Jewish people, especially if he were put in a position of leadership as Yaakov seemed to plan. However, they were clearly mistaken. The dangers that they see in his future all fall on Yehuda, their chosen alternate, rather than on Yoseph. Promiscuity: compare Yoseph's conduct with eishet Potiphar to Yehuda's with Tamar. Intermarriage: according to the midrash, Asenat is in fact Jewish, Dina's daughter by Shechem who followed Yoseph to Egypt, whereas Yehuda clearly marries a Canaanite. Materialism: Yoseph is noted for his scrupulous honesty handling enormous wealth, whereas Yehuda's wife is only identified as the daughter of his business partner, implying that he married for business concerns. For those who were worried, have no fear, Yehuda will redeem himself next week. The parshiyot therefore serve to avoid over-learning the lessons of the holiday, just as we read Yeshayahu's denunciation of hypocritical fasting and prayer on Yom Kippur and Kohelet's denigration of celebration on Sukkot. However, this is a call for balance and moderation, not negation of the main point. Compare Yoseph to that other Jewish interpreter of dreams who rose to power over a foreign land, Daniel. Here, we see a reversal. The descendants of Yoseph have gone confirmed the brothers' fears about their materialistic, assimilating, community-destroying tendencies, breaking the bulk of the tribes off into the northern kingdom, leading them to idolatry and sin, and completely disappearing in their exile; whereas Daniel, the descendant of Yehuda, has found the balance point that eluded his ancestor in last week's paresha and mirrors Yoseph almost exactly in holding fast to his values despite integrating deeply with Babylonian society, thereby saving the Jewish people.
How does all this help us understand why Greece is darkness and Hannukah is light? Here, I turn to Rav Zadok HaKohen Rabinowitz, a chassidic rabbi from Poland whose writings I have never read and am therefore probably mischaracterizing. Greece is not inherently darkness, contrasted with Jewish light. Rather, Yavan is meant to bring light and beauty to the world, but Greece as an empire was not fulfilling its function. To function correctly, Greek aesthetics, reason, and materialism must be in service to the moral teachings that they are not equipped to provide. Yaphet must dwell in the tents of Shem, ancestor of the Jews. When balance, order, and priorities are lost, the potential for good becomes evil. Darkness is the absence of light, not a light-sucking black cloud. When the Hashmonayim revolted, they were rectifying Greece, not destroying it. The last bit of pure oil that they found was the kernel of what Greece ought to have been all along, before they corrupted the bulk of their light-giving potential and went dark. According to Rav Zadok, it was only in the aftermath of Hannukah that the oral law was able to reach its full flowering, davka (specifically/only) because of Greek influence.
This is too long to push it too much further, but if you are interested and have access, check out Rav Hirsch's analysis of the Menorah in paresha Terumah. He connects it to ruach (spirit), and if we look at Shem, Yaphet, and Ham as corresponding to neshama, ruach, and nefesh respectively, then that dovetails nicely with my reading, and provides a lot of detail about what Yavan's proper role might be. But wait! that Menorah has seven branches, we are dealing with eight (the shamesh davka doesn't count, that's why it's there). Six (not mentioned, but makes seven and eight easier to explain) represents expansion in three dimensional space, right-left-forward-backward-up-down, ie material completion. Seven adds the center point, signifying the spiritual component allowing true completion, as seen in Shabbat among other places. Eight thus represents transcendence, going beyond the bounds of nature, as seen in brit milah, shemini atzeret, and other places. When Yavan is brought into the tent of Shem, when his spiritual gifts and capacities are sanctified such that we can even write a sefer Torah in Greek, there is something of that same covenantal transcendence.

Sorry for the length and disorder, hopefully that made sense anyway. Some of it may be building on or toward something that I thought about but forgot to include or left or for space purposes, but I don't expect to have time to edit properly before Hannukah, so if it doesn't make sense, ask.

Not too much news around here since last post. We had a wonderful wedding Thursday night, on a hill overlooking the scenic and historic town of Yericho. Among the honorees were Rav Matis Weinberg, mentioned above, and the chief rabbi of Sweden. I spent Shabbat with some Rutgers alumni, including an old daf yomi chaver. Did some experimental research into Jerusalem geography on the way back, and the results briefly had me off the derech, but I wasn't too late for D&D. There was a tiyul today to Ir David, but I woke up an hour after they left, so that gave me time to write way too much about Hannukah instead.

Happy Hannukah and Thanksgiving and any other celebrations you may or may not practice! Even if you aren't celebrating at all, happy days stam!

3 comments:

  1. Hi Ethan,

    This is such a meaty post, I'm not sure where to begin. I love the bit about the meaning of numbers six, seven, and eight.

    I guess the main comment I want to make is about materialism. You somehow link Greece with materialism, but this is quite foreign to Greek thought as I understand it. Clearly the Greek philosophers (especially Plato) rejected the importance of the material world altogether. Even Aristotle, the father of modern science and an early student of material reality, would I think place the material world on a lower plain than the life of the mind. And as I understand it, even their imperial tendencies were centered around the pursuit of glory in battle, and spreading the cultural dominance of their way of life, rather than a quest for material gain (contrasted perhaps with Rome).

    Working within your framework, I would say the darkness of Greece might rather lie in the lack of balance between an appreciation for material and spiritual things, which is present in Judaism and has always been one of the virtues I see in our religious tradition. In light of the terrible dominance of materialism in modern life, though, I wonder whether a teaching that tries to strike a balance between the life of the spirit and the life of the body, as ours does, is doomed to fail. The strength of our animal urges, which constantly push in the direction of materialism, might best be countered by a whole-hearted denigration of material things, rather than a nuanced view that appreciates the value in both, even if the nuanced view is more "true" in some sense.

    The fairly harsh boarding school classics-oriented upbringing which the British and American elite used to give their offspring can be credited with maintaining a balance between material and spiritual things, leading the ruling class in our societies, through most of our history, to lives of public service, and encouraging them to avoid excessive conspicuous consumption and dampen extremes of economic inequality.

    Perhaps the balance in traditional Jewish thought creates an equilibrium that is too tenuous (as shaky as a Fiddler on the Roof, to steal a phrase), which can fall too easily into a thoughtless embrace of materialism.

    Your loving Adversary

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think that it is easy to over-emphasize the centrality of Plato and Aristotle as representing Greek thought in that time and place. It seems likely that Epicuros, who lent his name to a Hebrew word for heresy, might have been more in the rabbis' minds. Regardless, your point is valid, and I may have over-emphasized the materialism. The effort to spread their culture is exactly the danger that the rabbis saw in the Greeks, as that culture (as expressed at that time) was in competition with Torah, while the strengths of reason that they embodied and represented were to be properly used in service thereto. Materialism per-se is associated more with Persia. The problem with Greece is reason misapplied, not ignored. If our task in life is to take to material world and elevate it to holiness, then taking the life of the mind and stripping it of holiness is quite the opposite, even if it is a strong and vibrant life of the mind.

      Delete
    2. Also, acknowledged that maintenance of proper balance is difficult and prone to failure, but is there a stable equilibrium? The only way I see to avoid the struggle for balance is to abandon it and accept failure, which may be more stable, but is not a different outcome from the involuntary failure of slipping out of balance.

      Delete